Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hansen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Montcalm. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit against an indorser of a promissory note. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This suit was brought before a justice of the peace in Montcalm county against defendant, as indorser ■of a promissory note of Willard Whitmore & Co., dated May 11, 1878, and payable to defendant’s order in 30 days, for $292, with interest at 10 per cent, after maturity. The suit was brought on the last day of the sixth year after the note became due, before William N. Eelyea, then a justice of the peace, the summons being issued June 13, 1884, and returnable June 24 thereafter. It now appears to have been served June 14, but questions arise concerning this that will be .referred to below.

Just…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gadsby v. StimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Crate v. PettepherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wong Kee v. LillisNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Archer v. LaidlawMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Township of Ovid v. HaireMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API