Legal Opinion

Farnham v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided June 27, 1949No. Motion No. 1608PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

This is an application for permission to file a claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act (L. 1939, ch. 860). We believe the moving affidavits spell out a mistake of fact on the part of claimant’s attorney. Perhaps claimant’s attorney could have been more diligent in making his inquiries and might have sooner learned that the State of New York and not the City of Dunkirk constructed and maintained the highway at the scene of the accident. However, under all the circumstances it appears to us that the excuse is reasonable.

The statement that the resident engineer…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flannery v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Buffington v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
  3. 47-Albany Troy Road Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Pagan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Norton v. New York State Thruway AuthorityCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API