Legal Opinion
U.S. Fire Insurance v. S/S JEBEL ALI
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1995No. 91 Civ. 3872 (PKL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
The third-party plaintiff, United Arab Shipping Co. (S.A.G.) (“UASC”), moves, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment on its third-party claims for indemnity against third-party defendant, Universal Maritime Services Corp. (“Universal”). 1 UASC asserts that Universal owes it money for damage that occurred to a shipment of wine. Universal, in turn, moves for summary judgment to dismiss the third party claims alleged by UASC as against Universal. For the reasons stated below, UASC’s motion is denied and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caemint Food, Inc. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, Companhia De NavegacaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Interstate Oil Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Stein Hall & Co., Inc., and Swift & Company v. S.S. Concordia Viking, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Skibs A/s Samuel Bakke, and Third-Party v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sea King Corp. v. Eimskip Logistics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- Markel American Insurance v. Dagmar's Marina, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007