Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 6, 2000No. 1D99-3883Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In 1985, the trial court would have had jurisdiction to consider and grant appellant’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, challenging the improper stacking of his minimum-mandatory sentences for five counts of robbery with a firearm. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983) (courts may not impose consecutive minimum-mandatory sentences when a firearm is used to commit multiple crimes at the same time and place); Moore v. State, 464 So.2d 1296…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bass v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API