Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Salisbury

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEager, J.

This is a motion pursuant to rule 106 of Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint herein for insufficiency. The action is one to recover for alleged slander spoken by •defendant concerning the plaintiff. It is alleged that the defendant is a duly licensed physician; that the plaintiff was a patient of defendant and that the defendant maliciously stated to others that the plaintiff ‘ ‘ made advances to me and threatened to leave me if I would not consent to become her lover — the woman (the plaintiff) has attempted the same thing with other doctors, specifically with Dr. C-that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Ostrowe v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Sleight v. WoodsNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Smith v. GodfreyNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Luft v. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steward v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jordan v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Hewitt v. WasekNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Fabian v. Amerikai Magyar SzoNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Brown v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API