Legal Opinion
Wildearth Guardians v. Salazar
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1174PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs 1 bring these consolidated actions challenging the United States Bureau of Land Management’s decision to authorize the leasing of certain public lands in northeastern Wyoming for coal mining operations. Before the Court is a series of cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, the relevant authorities, and the record as a whole, Plaintiffs’ [70, 71] Motions for Summary Judgment shall be DENIED and Defendants’ [74, 75, 79] Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment shall be GRANTED. 2
I.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wildearth Guardians v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- WildEarth Guardians v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Utah Physic. for Healthy Env't v. Diesel Power GearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Wildearth Guardians v. U.S. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kunaknana v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.