Anderson ex rel. Anderson v. Talladega Little League, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMaddox, Justice
The majority finds that this matter is now “moot, and the injunction by its own terms has expired,”1 and concludes that the party enjoined is entitled to no relief.
Talladega Little League, Inc., has contested the validity of the injunction here and has asked that this Court hold that the injunction was wrongfully obtained. The injunction was permanent in nature and is not necessarily “moot,” and even if the *388injunction, by its terms, has expired,2 that does not mean that the party enjoined is not entitled to recover if the injunction was wrongfully obtained. Clearly, the injunction should not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wells v. Mobile County Bd. of Realtors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- In Re Galilee Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Alabama High School Athletic Ass'n v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Kubiszyn v. Alabama High School Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Dixon v. Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.