Tuengel v. City of Sitka, Alaska
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a con sequence of the alleged negligence of the defendant city, as operator of a hospital, and the defendant Board of National Missions, as landlord.
Plaintiff, a barber, went to the hospital to cut the hair of Cresa, a welfare patient. In response to plaintiff’s inquiry, the nurse directed him to Cresa’s room, but, as a result of misunderstanding or otherwise, the plaintiff opened the door to the basement and plunged down the stairs to the floor, sustaining the injuries complained of.
In his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Madison v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Moats v. Sisters of Charity of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
- Carr v. City of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
3Cited by15 opinions
- Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Collopy v. Newark Eye and Ear InfirmarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Kamau Ex Rel. Lovell v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
- Calomeris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.