Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Huntsman International, L.L.C. and Rubicon, L.L.C. v. Praxair, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 2024No. 2022-CA-0777Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
* NO. 2022-CA-0777 HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. AND * COURT OF APPEAL RUBICON, L.L.C. * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA PRAXAIR, INC. * * ******* DLD DYSART, J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART I concur with the majority’s decision insofar as it affirms the trial court’s findings that Praxair breached its contracts with Huntsman and caused damages to Huntsman. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the amount awarded to Huntsman for lost profits. I would amend the judgment to reduce the award for lost profits to $37,522,291, which, in my opinion, is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Housing Authority of New Orleans v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Simpson v. RESTRUCTURE PETROLEUM MARK SER.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Citadel Broadcasting Corp. v. Axis U.S. Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Rosbottom v. Office Lounge, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Houston v. ChargoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.