Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Beasley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 18, 1975No. 20040PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness. Justice:

This is a divorce action between the parties who were married in 1936 and separated in 1970. The children are sui juris.

The exceptions on this appeal all arise out of the basic contention that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding inadequate property settlement and alimony.

The general rule is that in determining the amo.unt of alimony to be awarded, the matter is one addressed to the trial court’s broad discretion and that in the absence of a clear abuse of such, the order granting or denying it will not be disturbed. Divorce, Key § 235.

Alimqny is founded upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Carrigg v. Carrigg (In Re Carrigg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  4. Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API