Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Beam

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1987No. 86-287PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., we granted the defendant's petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals in this "no opinion" case, 502 So.2d 396, to review a single issue: Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant's "challenge for cause" of a prospective juror.

Because the State agrees with the petitioner's Rule 39(k) statement of the facts, we quote directly from that statement:

"On voir dire examination the defense asked prospective jurors the following question: 'Do any of you have a strong religious or moral belief against the use of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bankhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Ex Parte RutledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Knop v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API