Ex Parte Beam
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., we granted the defendant's petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals in this "no opinion" case, 502 So.2d 396, to review a single issue: Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant's "challenge for cause" of a prospective juror.
Because the State agrees with the petitioner's Rule 39(k) statement of the facts, we quote directly from that statement:
"On voir dire examination the defense asked prospective jurors the following question: 'Do any of you have a strong religious or moral belief against the use of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bankhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte RutledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Knop v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.