Legal Opinion

Ruhl v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1992No. 1744 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

William J. Ruhl appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 411(1). We affirm.

Ruhl was employed by Mac-It Parts, Inc. (Mac-It) as a screw machine operator. He operated the machine while sitting on a stool placed atop a three-foot square platform that was raised approximately twelve inches above the ground. Ruhl testified that on February 29, 1984, he felt a twinge in his right knee as he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Auto Express, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Cardyn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Northeastern Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruhl v. WCAB (Mac-It Parts, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API