Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stephens Prod. Co. v. Mainer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 2019No. : CV-18-931Published

1DissentRhonda K. Wood, Justice

Under Rule 23(a) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure (2017), a class action is appropriate only if the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Today, our court breaks new ground in affirming the circuit court's conclusion that a putative class of seven to thirty-six members is so numerous that joinder is impracticable. Because the majority further relaxes our already liberal requirements for class certification, I dissent.

Until today, a forty-one-member subclass was the smallest class that this court had recognized as having satisfied the numerosity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BNL Equity Corp. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Philip Morris Cos. Inc. v. MinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. FirstPlus Home Loan Owner 1997-1 v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Valley Ex Rel. Anderson v. National Zinc Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API