People ex rel. Haggerty v. Clausen

It is well settled that where the services of a person are required by the municipality for some special work, he may be dismissed when such work is finished. People ex rel. Uhrie v. Gilroy, 60 Hun, 507; People ex rel. O’Connor v. Adams, 133 N. Y. 203; People ex rel. Bernard v. Wurster, 89 Hun, 5; Matter of Vincent v. Cram, 27 Misc. Rep. 158. The relator was appointed for special work on the speedway, and when *702the work on the speedway had so far progressed that his services were no longer required he was removed. Such removal was legal under the cases cited. The contention of the relator,…