Legal Opinion

Farkas v. Rubin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 6, 2019No. 2019 NYSlipOp 51971(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

George A. Farkas, Respondent,

against

Irving Rubin, Defendant, and Harry Rubin, Appellant.

Law Office of Allen Schwartz, Esq. (Allen Schwartz of counsel), for appellant. George A. Farkas, respondent pro se.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered April 12, 2018. The order denied defendant Harry Rubin's motion to vacate so much of a judgment of that court entered June 26, 2017 as was entered against him upon his failure to appear or answer the complaint and, upon such vacatur, to dismiss so much of the complaint as was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Hallston Manor Farm v. AndrewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API