Legal Opinion

People v. Guardino

New York County Courts

Decided November 6, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrancato, J.

The defendant was convicted by the verdict of the jury for compulsory prostitution in violation of subdivisions 3 and 8 of section 2460 of the Penal Law. He makes this motion to set aside the conviction and for a new trial upon the grounds, first, that since, by subdivision 9 of said section 2460, “ No conviction shall be had under this section upon the testimony of the female unless supported by other evidence,” the testimony of the complainant, a prostitute, could not be supported by that of another prostitute, also named in the indictment as having been induced, enticed and procured for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. . SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. People v. . O'FarrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. People v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PasquarelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. People v. GuardinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. People v. JacksonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. Rivas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API