Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sanatass v. Consolidated Investing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2007Published

1Dissent

Sweeny and McGuire, JJ, dissent in a memorandum by McGuire, J., as follows:

Plaintiff Christopher Sanatass, an employee of a nonparty contractor, was installing air conditioning units and performing duct work in a building owned by defendant Consolidated Investing Company (Consolidated). The work was being performed on a floor leased by defendant Chroma Copy (Chroma), a subsidiary of third-party defendant C2 Media (collectively, the lessees). The lease prohibited the lessees from making any changes to the demised premises without the prior consent of Consolidated. Neither of the lessees…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Abbatiello v. Lancaster Studio AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Celestine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API