Legal Opinion

Daniel Lado v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 2, 2011No. 09–0853PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAGER, Justice.

Daniel Lado appeals the district court’s dismissal of his application for postconviction relief for failure to prosecute under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.944. Lado claims his failure to advance his application resulted from ineffective assistance of counsel. The court of appeals found Lado’s counsel was ineffective, but preserved his claim for postconviction relief because it could not determine from the record whether there was a reasonable probability that the proceeding would have been different had counsel sought a continuance. On further review, we find Lado’s counsel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Brian K. Allison v. State of iowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Robert Krogmann v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Francisco Villa Magana v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. Aaron David Secor v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026
  5. Allen Killings, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API