Legal Opinion

Bodden v. John H. Detter Coeeee Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendants contend, (1) that as matter of law the plaintiff’s negligence as to lookout was a cause of the collision; (2) that the jury’s findings of no causal connection between plaintiff’s negligence and the collision and of the comparative contributory negligence of the two drivers to produce the collision are inconsistent and vitiate the verdict; and (3) that the jury’s finding of contributory negligence should be disregarded because the jury were not required to answer the question of comparative negligence in view of their finding of want of causal connection between plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. RoffersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McGeehan v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Oelke v. EarleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Goelz v. KnoblauchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Joseph E. Sayen, Jr. v. Edwin J. Rydzewski and Badger Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API