A.T. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
A.T. was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent for committing an act that would be felony murder if committed by an adult, and the juvenile court ordered wardship of him to the Indiana Department of Corree*492tion pursuant to both indeterminate and determinate sentences. A.T. now appeals his determinate sentence, which requires him to remain in the care and custody of the DOC until his eighteenth birthday, arguing that the juvenile court failed to make a determination required by statute. We conclude that notwithstanding language in the determinate sentence statute,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- B.K.C. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Chavis v. PattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pendleton v. AguilarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. DoodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- K.A. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.T. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- At v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012