Legal Opinion
Wilder v. Brace
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 8, 1963No. Civ. 7-177PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
In their answers or by separate motions, the defendants have moved to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (1).
For the purposes of the present motions it is sufficient to note the following background, as disclosed by the complaint and affidavits filed by the parties in support of their respective positions. The action is one for a declaratory judgment brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. 1 The jurisdiction of this Court is asserted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. 2 The complaint alleges that each of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rosenbaum v. BauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lapides v. DonerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
- City of Tucson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cupo v. Community National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- City of Tucson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Now Known as Qwest Corporation v. Martha Chase, Ex Rel State of Arizona, County Attorney for Santa Cruz County County of Santa Cruz, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002