Legal Opinion

Morin v. Robarge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1903No. Docket No. 205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by James Morin against Benjamin Eobarge for work and labor. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Under the common counts in assumpsit, plaintiff recovered in the court below a verdict and judgment for $1,331.98. The testimony of plaintiff tended to prove that defendant owed him over $1,500 for manu*338factoring poles, posts, and ties, in pursuance of an oral contract. The testimony of defendant tended to prove that nothing was du® the plaintiff. Issues were raised by the testimony of the parties respecting both the terms of the contract and the amount of work done thereunder. These issues were submitted to the jury, who, as above stated, found for the plaintiff. We are asked to reverse the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howell v. MedlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Fletcher v. BradfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Beecher v. PetteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luckhurst v. SchroederMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Shannon v. Township of JamestownMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wilson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Blanksma v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API