Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Dudek

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 9, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-0944Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) FELECIA B., 1 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 25-cv-944 (GMH) ) FRANK BISIGNANO, 2 Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Felecia B. filed this action seeking to reverse the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Frank Bisignano (“Defendant” or “the Commissioner”), denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API