Legal Opinion
United States v. Premises Known as 281 Syosset Woodbury Rd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1992No. CV-90-3626PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
In this forfeiture action, the claimant has moved for leave to file a supplemental answer and to file an intervenor complaint on behalf of her minor children; the government has cross-moved to strike the claim already filed by the claimant on behalf of the children. For the reasons set forth below, the motions of the claimant to file a supplemental answer and to file an inter-venor complaint are granted in part and denied in part, and the motion of the government is granted.
FACTS
On May 1, 1990, the United States brought this action in the United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. 4492 South Livonia RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $2,857.00Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. 1982 Yukon Delta HouseboatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diaz v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Adams v. FrancoNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Portland v. One Parcel of Real PropertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Mays-Watt v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court · 2003