Legal Opinion

Renneckar v. Canton Terminal Restaurant, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1947No. 30903PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Plaintiff takes the position, as did the Court of Appeals according to its opinion, that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies here — that the circumstances surrounding plaintiff’s injuries made out a prima facie case for recovery against the defendant without direct proof of negligence on its part — and that a jury question was presented.

By several of its later decisions this court is now committed to the proposition that res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence which permits, but does uot require, the jury to draw an inference of negligence in a case where thé instrumentality causing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. City of Cleveland v. AmatoOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gunning v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. City of Cleveland v. PineOhio Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hake v. George Wiedemann Brewing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Soltz v. Colony Recreation CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Cusumano v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Moore v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Fischer v. Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API