Legal Opinion

Monteith v. Hogg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the county of Linn.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is a suit in equity originating in a cross-bill to an action of ejectment, to which a demurrer was sustained, and a decree rendered therein, from which this appeal is brought.

Sufficient facts to understand the question raised are $hese: The plaintiff being indebted on four promissory notes, with one D. B. Monteith as surety, to secure him mortgaged the real property included in this suit. Subsequently D. B. Monteith foreclosed the mortgage, but prior to the sale by the sheriff, the plaintiff and the said Monteith made an agreement to the effect that he was to bid in the property for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rodman v. NathanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyum v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Bown v. FrankOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Brecht v. Law Union & Crown Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
  4. Crapper v. Berliner's Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API