Legal Opinion
Banks v. Lombardo
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 11, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00556Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 JAMES VINCENT BANKS, Case No. 2:20-cv-00556-APG-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10 v. [Docket No. 18] 11 JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Gregory Bryan’s motion for more definite statement 14 or to strike. Docket No. 18. Plaintiff has not filed a response. The motion is properly resolved 15 without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED 16 in its entirety. 17 I. MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT 18 The pending motion primarily seeks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kor Media Group, LLC v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Larry Davis v. Ruby Foods, Inc., Doing Business as Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., and Baskin-Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Dalton Petrie v. Electronic Game Card, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Woods v. Reno Commodities, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.