Glicksman v. Earley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Chippewa County. Tbe case is stated in tbe opinion. They contended, inter alia, that notice was not received seasonably by the appellant so as to charge him as indorser. The note was dishonored Saturday, July 6th, but the appellant did not receive notice until Wednesday, July 10th.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Chippewa County. Tbe case is stated in tbe opinion. They contended, inter alia, that notice was not received seasonably by the appellant so as to charge him as indorser. The note was dishonored Saturday, July 6th, but the appellant did not receive notice until Wednesday, July 10th. Both the sender of the notice and the appellant lived in the same city, and to charge the latter the notice must have been received by him not later than Monday, July Sth. 2 Daniel, Neg. Inst. (2d ed.), secs. 1003, 1038; Benj. Chaim. Dig. 186, art. 195; John, v. Oity Nat. Bank, 57…
1Opinion of the CourtObtoN, J.
This action is predicated upon the following promissory note, indorsement, protest, and notice thereof:
“ $1,000. Chippewa Falls, June 3, 1889.
“ Thirty days after date I promise to pay to the order of M. ClAcksman one thousand dollars at Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank, value received, with interest at eight per cent, per annum. [Signed] L. J. Newald.”
Indorsement: “M. Q-lioKSMAN,
“ H. W. Eablet.”
Annexed thereto is the following certificate of protest:
“ State of Wisconsin, County of Chippewa, City of Chippewa Falls — ss.: I, S. B. Nimmons, a notary public in and for the county of Chippewa, do hereby…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brewster v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Aiken v. Marine BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863