Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Arthur

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Aldrich, J., Richland, March, 1889. The opinion fully states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion'of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Simpson.

One Stephen W. McKenzie, late of Richland County, died in 1887, testate, leaving a widow, Harriet McKenzie, the defendant, and two minor daughters. His estate consisted of a small amount of personal property, and two small houses and two lots of land situate in the city of Columbia. The widow declined to take under the will, and the estate of the deceased being indebted, a proceeding was instituted in the Court of Common Pleas, in the nature of a creditors’ bill, against *513the defendant Arthur as administrator with the will…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Ex Parte MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. FEDERAL NAT'L. MTG. ASSN. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Bradley v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API