Legal Opinion

Arrowsmith v. United Press International

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided April 26, 1962No. Civ. No. 3328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of Maryland, brought a complaint against Defendant, United Press International. Plaintiff does not allege under the laws of what state Defendant was incorporated but does allege that it maintains an office and does business in Vermont. Plaintiff further alleges that a diversity of citizenship exists.

Defendant has moved for dismissal of the action on the grounds that Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, lack of jurisdiction because of insufficiency of service of process and improper venue.

*57Without passing on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landstrom v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Lancour v. Herald and Globe Ass'n.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Venn v. Tennessean Newspapers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
  4. Longey v. SlatorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Augustus Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (p.r.) Inc., and Peerless Oil & Chemical Corp.,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API