Rawles v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Per curiam
The Arkansas Department of Human Services (ADHS) has filed a “Motion for Compliance” requesting that we order the appellants to abstract portions of the record that they have not included in their brief. ADHS contends that appellants’ abstract is deficient because they have abstracted only one of seven hearings that were held by the trial court. ADHS argues that we should require appellants to abstract the testimony from all seven hearings that are included in the record. We deny the motion.
In their notice of appeal, appellants designated an abbreviated record as their record on appeal,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Branscumb v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Cobbs v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. SoutherlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999