Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance v. Schneider

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2006No. 1129 EDA 2004PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PANELLA, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Paul P. Schneider, challenges the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Appellee, Nationwide Insurance Company, as well as the denial of Schneider’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The disposition of the trial court permits Nationwide to deny un-derinsured motorist benefits (UIM) to Schneider, and relies upon the insurance policy’s provisions which (1) necessitate Nationwide’s consent before the insured settles any claims with third-party tortfea-sors, and (2) requires exhaustion by payment of the limits of primary or first priority…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Grandelli v. Methodist HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  2. Nationwide Insurance v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Caplen v. SN Servicing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. American States Insurance v. Estate of BraheemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API