Nationwide Insurance v. Schneider
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Paul P. Schneider, challenges the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Appellee, Nationwide Insurance Company, as well as the denial of Schneider’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The disposition of the trial court permits Nationwide to deny un-derinsured motorist benefits (UIM) to Schneider, and relies upon the insurance policy’s provisions which (1) necessitate Nationwide’s consent before the insured settles any claims with third-party tortfea-sors, and (2) requires exhaustion by payment of the limits of primary or first priority…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Grandelli v. Methodist HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Nationwide Insurance v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Caplen v. SN Servicing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- American States Insurance v. Estate of BraheemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.