Legal Opinion

Bakken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5774PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal we are required to determine whether “other insurance” clauses contained in the uninsured motorist coverage provisions of two policies issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) prevented the plaintiffs from recovering the total amount of insurance provided in both policies. The trial court was of the opinion that the “other insurance” clauses were not applicable to the claims presented in the plaintiffs’ complaint, and accordingly, entered judgment holding that State Farm must provide the limits of uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Transportation Insurance Company v. WadeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lopez v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Transnational Insurance Company v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. LaFleur v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bakken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API