Legal Opinion

Reinheimer v. Greenville

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1930No. 374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

There is nothing in the record to indicate that Greenville has an ordinance providing for automobile licenses under which the defendant was a licensee. In the absence of such showing, the action revoking the license to drive is unauthorized and without effect. We think the provision of the ordinance invoked is incapable of execution in this case because there is no subject matter upon which it may operate.

Coming to the weight of the evidence: This case is very close indeed on the mattec of proof. All of the testimony tending to establish the intoxication of the defendant comes from the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. BlanchardOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Fairfield v. TillettOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API