Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles N. Matthews

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 29, 1980No. 78-1423PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Charles Nathaniel Matthews brings a timely appeal of his conviction and sentence 1 under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. 2 Trial was had to a jury on March 22, 1978, on a one-count indictment stating that on or about January 31, 1978, the defendant

did unlawfully, knowingly, and willfully transport in interstate commerce a motor vehicle, knowing the same to be stolen, to wit: a 1970 Ford belonging to and stolen from Dick Strauss Ford in Richmond, Virginia, on January 21,1978, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2312.

Because sufficiency of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Sharon Olabisiomotosho v. City of Houston City of Houston P. J. Bartlett K. L. Richards Rene BertrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. ShareefCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. David Allen MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Augustin Alonso LopezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API