In Re Forfeiture of 2006 Chrysler 4-Door
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
David Gee, the Hillsborough County Sheriff, appeals the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of Kale Gainous, dismissing a forfeiture action and directing that a 2006 Chrysler automobile be returned to Mr. Gainous. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A), and reverse.
The forfeiture proceeding stems from Mr. Gainous’s 2007 arrest and subsequent conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) and failure to submit to a DUI test. Mr. Gainous had two prior DUI convictions. His license was suspended and he previously refused to submit to a DUI…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Agresta v. City of MaitlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015