Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Carter

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 16, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00484Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION LOREN WAYNE TIDWELL, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-484-MGG NANCY B. MARTHAKIS, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Loren Wayne Tidwell, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a second amended complaint against three defendants. ECF 57. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Herbert L. Board v. Karl Farnham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API