Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
In Re Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.; Gabriella Tower, LLC; And Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.—gabriella Tower Contractor Series
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 2026No. 24-0293Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0293 ══════════ In re Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.; Gabriella Tower, LLC; and Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.— Gabriella Tower Contractor Series, Relators ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ═══════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE HUDDLE, joined by Justice Bland, Justice Young, and Justice Sullivan, concurring in part and dissenting in part. In an earlier case involving five jointly and severally liable defendants who secured a joint $25 million bond, the Court described Civil Practice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Niz-Chavez v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- in Re Longview Energy Company and in Re Huff Energy Fund, L.P., and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Fortune v. McElhenneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- McFarlane v. HowellTexas Supreme Court · 1897