Gribble v. Haas
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE, JUDGE.
This is an appeal from a judgment of ejecment against a lessee, and the plaintiff, appellee, has made a motion to dismiss the appeal on tiro grounds: lo that the order for a suspensive appeal was obtained too late, and 2o that the bond is not sufficient.
I
The facts are that the judgment of ejection was rendered December 22nd., 1919, and signed on December 24th., 1919; on December 24th., 1919, the Court granted the defendant an order for a suspensive appeal on her furnishing bond in the sum «’■<’ two hundred and fifty dollars which she furnished.
The plaintiff filed,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zeigler v. Danbury & Norwalk RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Audubon Hotel Co. v. BraunigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Poydras v. PatinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
- Stevens v. UnderhillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1883
- Town of New Hartford v. Town of CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.