Legal Opinion

Bloeser v. Semeul

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County

Decided November 13, 1930No. 842Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rossiter, P. J.,

This is a rule to strike off a judgment entered on a lease. There is no dispute as to the facts. It appears that the lease was originally made between the defendant in the judgment and one William Bloeser; that William Bloeser died November 1, 1928, having devised the leased premises to the plaintiffs in the judgment. In our opinion, a power of attorney to confess judgment is not a covenant running with the land (Reber v. Evans, 8 D. & C. 551; Schultz v. Burlock, 6 Pa. Superior Ct. 573), and hence there was no power or authority in the lease which would authorize the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schultz v. BurlockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API