Legal Opinion

In re Wayne H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: After respondent filed a notice of appeal from an oral decision, an order was entered on that decision. We exercise our discretion to treat the appeal as taken from that order (see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988).

Family Court properly denied respondent’s motion to dismiss this person in need of supervision (PINS) proceeding because the dispositional hearing had been adjourned beyond the two-month period set forth in Family Court Act § 749 (b). Article 7 of the Family Court Act does not expressly provide…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Matter of Jose R.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In re Eddie M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. In re Richard G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re McC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Yarras F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re Dakota K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re Ashley EE.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API