Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1975No. SC 970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The question presented is the effect of a clause in a warranty deed which reserved to the grantor an option to repurchase. The deed, in pertinent parts, is as follows:

“THIS INDENTURE, Made the 17th day of June, 1969, between MILDRED *27E. WILKINS, a widow, GRANTOR, and ROBERT I. FERGUSON, GRANTEE; WITNESSETH, the GRANTOR, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, hereby acknowledge to have been paid the GRANTOR by the GRANTEE, does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said GRANTEE, his heirs and assigns, all that real property in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Henry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Seaboard A. L. Ry. Co. v. Anniston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Financial Inv. v. Tukabatchee Area, Etc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Baldwin County, Ala. v. Purcell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Moss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Exxon Corp. v. WaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API