Clark v. State

We find merit only in the appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in not re-sentencing him pursuant to the guidelines1 *303as directed by our mandate in Ms previous appeal. Clark v. State, 645 So.2d 575, 577 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s convictions but reverse Ms sentences and remand for resentencmg pursuant to the grnde-lines.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

FRANK, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.. The trial court did not err in denying the appellant's motion to be sentenced pursuant to the 1994 guidelines. The…