Legal Opinion

Irby v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 18, 1998No. Record 971990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Koontz

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court properly determined that the language of a deed purporting to grant an easement to construct a pier was ambiguous and, thus, failed to transfer the necessary riparian right for that purpose.

BACKGROUND

Paul W. and Jean W. Bounds owned a subdivided peninsula of land, consisting of Lots 68, 69, 70, and 71, known as Stove Point Neck in Middlesex County. The Piankatank River runs along one side of the peninsula, while the other side is bounded by Fishing Bay.

The Piankatank River and Fishing Bay are tidal, navigable bodies of water. In 1963, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  2. Langman v. ALUMNI ASS'N OF U. OF VA.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  3. Langman v. Alumni Association of the UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Trailsend Land Co. v. Virginia Holding Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman Family, L.L.C. v. Mill Two Associates PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Evelyn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Forster v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Carr v. KiddSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. BURWELL'S BAY IMPROVEMENT ASS'N v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API