Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Shahar v. Bowers

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 20, 1995No. 93-9345Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKravitch, Circuit Judge

In my view, this case is not primarily about religion or expression or equal protection. Rather, the constitutional deprivation suffered by Shahar1 is the burdening of her First Amendment right of intimate association. In the public employment context, an employee’s intimate association rights must be balanced against the government’s legitimate concerns with the efficient functioning of its agencies. I therefore disagree with the majority’s holding that strict scrutiny ought to be applied in this case. Nonetheless, utilizing a balancing test, I conclude that Sha-har is entitled to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API