Legal Opinion

Eureka Life Insurance v. Geis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Díjeey, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

Ann C. Hammond devised certain ground rents specifically mentioned in the second clause of her will, to her son Bezin W. Hammond for and during his natural life, and after his death to his children equally, share and share alike, but should no child or descendant be living at the time of his death, then the said property was to go to and vest absolutely in the “right heirs” of the testatrix.

The son survived the mother and died on the 31st day of May, 1911, leaving no natural child or descendant surviving him, but leaving one, Beulah E. B. Hammond, an infant, who by decree of the Circuit Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sewall v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Wyeth v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Van Derlyn v. MackMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lumpkin v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  5. Wickes v. WickesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Purifoy v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Middletown Trust Co. v. GaffeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Smith v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hans v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Cook v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API