Legal Opinion

Students for Online Voting v. Machen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 2009No. 1D09-4214Published

1Per curiam

Respondent, an agency of the State of Florida subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, issued a final order but refuses to properly render it by filing it with the clerk. See § 120.52(7), Fla. Stat. (2009); Bank of Port St. Joe v. State, Dep’t of Banking and Fin., 362 So.2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The petitioners’ appeal from that order was previously dismissed because the order had not been rendered. Students for Online Voting v. Student Gov’t of the Student Body of the Univ. of Fla., 10 So.3d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Having considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. RuvinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Bank of Port St. Joe v. State, Department of Banking & FinanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Students for Online Voting v. STUDENT GOVERNMENT OF STUDENT BODY OF UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API