Legal Opinion

Conrad & Co. v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, the Pottawatamie District Court, 'This suit was brought 'to recover the balance due on a judgment rendered in the District Court of Wapello county, in this state. The defendant pleaded nul tiel record, former recovery, and payment. The questions presented for determination, arise upon these defences. The material facts will be found in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, C. J.

It first becomes material to inquire, whe* *208ther a paper appearing in the record, can be treated as a bill of exceptions. The cleric certifies that certain papers, which precede his certificate are a true, perfect, and complete transcript of the proceedings in this cause. After this, we find" a paper, purporting to be a bill of exceptions, which is in no . manner certified to be a part of the record — does not appear to have been filed in court — and nothing beyond the title of ' the cause, and the signature of the judge, to connect it with the proceedings in the case. Under such…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freher v. GeesekaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  2. Rawson v. GuibersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API