Legal Opinion
Tricomi v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1993PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated January 8, 1991, which denied the application.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The denial of the application for leave to serve a late notice of claim was a proper exercise of discretion since the New York City Housing Authority did not acquire actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days after the claim arose, or within a reasonable time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mallory v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Figueroa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Plantin v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Weber v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Dancy v. Poughkeepsie Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Embery v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Gorman v. Sachem Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.