Legal Opinion

Samuelsen v. Yassky

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anil C. Singh, J.

Petitioners move by order to show cause pursuant to CPLR article 78 for an order enjoining and restraining respondents: (a) from proceeding with their “Group Ride Vehicle Pilot Program” (the pilot program) pursuant to which commuter vans and for-hire vehicles can pick up passengers on former bus routes, without such pickups being prearranged through a base; (b) from suspending Rules of Taxi and Limousine Commission (35 RCNY), chapter 6 (“For Hire Vehicles”), § 6-12.1 (f) and § 6-16 (f) and chapter 9 (“Commuter Vans”), § 9-10 (d) and (e) (2), or any other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. New York State Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. NovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Anderson v. . Fidelity Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API